Tulsi Gabbard, former congresswoman and a recent addition to the Republican Party, is facing renewed scrutiny following her nomination by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the U.S. intelligence community as Director of National Intelligence (DNI). Gabbard, known for her strong anti-war stance, previously caused controversy due to a 2017 trip to Syria where she met with President Bashar al-Assad and questioned U.S. intelligence claims about chemical weapon use in Syria. Her past comments on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, including expressing sympathy for Russia’s security concerns and suggesting U.S. involvement in the conflict was provoking Moscow, have also drawn criticism.
Her appointment, if confirmed, would place her in charge of 18 U.S. spy agencies and in close proximity to the president on national security matters. However, her past actions and comments have raised concerns among both U.S. lawmakers and international allies about her judgment and potential biases. Some critics fear that Gabbard’s views on Assad and Putin could undermine U.S. intelligence relationships with key allies, potentially complicating intelligence-sharing and diplomacy.
While Trump defended Gabbard’s nomination, praising her military experience and outspoken independence, others within his party, like Nikki Haley, have expressed reservations about her suitability for such a crucial role. Gabbard’s critics have accused her of aligning with adversarial nations, a charge she rejects, calling her critics “warmongers.” The contentious nomination process is likely to face tough questions during Senate confirmation hearings, as lawmakers debate whether Gabbard’s foreign policy views would align with U.S. interests.
NEWS DESK
PRESS UPDATE