Ukraine’s parliament has voted to remove the independence of two leading anti-corruption bodies—NABU and SAPO. This decision has sparked immediate backlash from watchdog groups, opposition politicians, and international partners. Under the new law, both agencies will now report directly to the prosecutor general, who is appointed by President Volodymyr Zelensky. As a result, critics fear this will undermine independent investigations and allow political interference. The European Union responded strongly, calling the decision a “serious step back.” EU officials stressed that an independent anti-corruption system is crucial for Ukraine’s path toward membership. Meanwhile, local NGOs like the Anti-Corruption Action Center warned the law could neutralize ongoing investigations. According to them, the president’s allies may now be shielded from prosecution. Clearly, this decision has raised serious concerns about the integrity of Ukraine’s anti-corruption reforms and democratic checks on presidential power.
In addition, opposition leaders in Ukraine have condemned the move, accusing the government of a power grab. They argue that the law allows the president to control anti-corruption efforts indirectly. One opposition lawmaker claimed the government is “placing loyalty above accountability.” For years, NABU and SAPO have investigated corruption in government institutions and prosecuted high-level officials. These agencies were created under international pressure to ensure fairness and independence. Therefore, this shift in control risks reversing Ukraine’s reform progress. Although the Zelensky administration has not yet commented, observers believe this decision could weaken global trust in Ukraine’s leadership. Notably, the country is actively seeking international aid and deeper European integration. If these agencies lose credibility, Ukraine’s ability to secure support may suffer. Ultimately, the move threatens both Ukraine’s internal accountability and its international reputation. The situation remains tense, with growing calls for the president to reconsider the legislation.
NEWS DESK
PRESS UPDATE